A400: Various economical, technological and productional consequences

The Earth’s wobbling and shaking sets in motion massive nature forces worldwide, which – combined with the increasing extreme weather, extreme temperatures and climate chaos – cause enormous material damage and destruction, technological disturbancies and produc­tional obstructions.

According to ZetaTalk, Nibiru is the cause of a heat up of the Earth’s core. The heat moves outwards to the oceans, which results in ocean warming, which again influences the troposphere and the climate in several ways. The fact that the oceans are the primary influence on climate and tropospheric temperatures, and not the other way around, and the fact that the Sun and changes in the atmosphere (including the products of human activity) only minimally can influence the ocean temperatures, have been elementary insights among oceanographists for several decades. Robert E. Stevenson (1921-2001), oceanographist and father of space oceanography, wrote in 2000 the very interesting and recommendable epistle Yes, the Ocean Has Warmed; No, It’s Not ‘Global Warming’.

From the ZetaTalk note Heralding (July 15, 1995):

”Weather changes heralding the giant comet's approach will at first be within normal parameters. As long as meteorologists can find a similar pattern on the books or an old timer can be found to regale us with tales of the old days, no one will get unduly alarmed. The weather, after all, is a constant source of conversation, but the intensity of these discussions will change when the effects on food chains relied upon by man move outside of familiar boundaries. It is at this point that Alarm Bells will go off. All attempts to explain the changes based on Global Warming from the Greenhouse effect will run into snags as the weather will refuse to be predictable. Areas of the world which have been deserts throughout mankind's memory will become swamps under constant and repeated rains. Temperate climates used to periodic gentle rainfall will suffer intractable droughts. Then this will switch about, for no apparent reason. The reason lies deep within the Earth's core, an area the meteorologists refuse to consider, and thus their predictions on the atmosphere will never be based on the right parameters.

A key change, to which one could point, is the warming of the Earth's oceans, around the globe. This has been measured as a 6 inch rise, worldwide, on all the beaches. The waters have risen because they are warmer, and warm water takes up more room than cold water, as all elementary physics books will report. How is it that the oceans, so very deep and so very cold, have warmed up? Is it the almost imperceptible rise in the temperature of the air, a degree or so, as reported to date? Since heat rises, why would this slight rise affect the oceans? Meteorologists will tell you that the effect of air warming is air turbulence, not warmer oceans. The oceans are warmer because the core of the Earth has heated up, and it does so in response to its brother coming closer.”

From ZT Chat October 15, 2011:

“Global Warming as the excuse for the Earth changes brought on by the approach of Planet X was intended to cover the effects of the roiling Earth core. Up until the 1980's a Global Cooling trend was expected, but this changed due to data observed in the late 1980's. By 1988 the trend was clear. Global Warming was being recorded. Glaciers were melting, and a perceptible increase in air and ocean temperature could be claimed. The establishment was aware that Planet X was inbound by 1983, confirmed by their own IRAS sightings via an infrared balloon sent above the clouds. Volcanic activity was on the increase, particularly undersea volcanic activity which is primarily invisible to the public. Thus, the claim that carbon emissions were causing this would serve as the cover for these Earth changes caused by Planet X, or so the establishment hoped.

Once set in motion, and with such esteemed spokespersons as Al Gore leading the charge, the establishment tweaked the data to support their claims, and until it was discovered that they used erroneous data to lie about the matter, were able to fool the public to a great extent. By then, to maintain the illusion that politicians were taking the Global Warming excuse seriously, carbon tax laws had been passed. In the world of government and greed, money collected for any reason is not given back, not returned. Once started, a trend is hard to reverse. The Global Warming excuse for rising sea levels in those regions that are sinking has also been useful for the establishment. Thus, these lies are perpetuated.”

The scientific consensus is that the troposphere’s average global temperature during the last 100 years (1906-2005) has increased with 0,74 °C. The scientific quarrel is about the cause and the consequences of this very slight increase in temperature. Is the increase within the normal climatic variation, and therefore needs no further explanation? To explain the increase in temperature by an increase in solar activity has gone out of fashion in the latest decade, since the amount of irradiation from the Sun that is experienced on Earth has been record low during the last 11-year solar cycle.

The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) has concluded that increasing greenhouse gas concentrations resulting from human activity such as fossil fuel burning and deforestation have caused most of the observed temperature increase since the middle of the 20th century. The major greenhouse gases are: Water vapor, which causes about 36–70 % of the greenhouse effect; carbon dioxide (CO₂), which causes 9–26 %; methane (CH₄), which causes 4–9 %; and ozone (O₃), which causes 3–7 %. Since it is difficult to explain water vapor as an environ­mental threat, IPCC has instead chosen to focus on the CO2 concentrations. As a matter of fact, an increase of CO2 just makes our world greener and more lush. The CO2 level in the pre-industrial era represented around 0,028 % of the Earth’s atmosphere. It is mainly the increase of CO2, this enhancer of lushness, from 0,028 % to today’s level of 0,038 %, that IPCC blames for the increase of the average global temperature the last hundred years (1906-2005) by 0,74 °C. The critics of the consensus view, however, claim that all the facts indicate that it is the atmospheric temperature level that determines the CO2 level, and not the other way around.

Nobel Peace Price winner Al Gore and the media debate have served as a gigantic decoy
with their primary focus on the average global temperature and the CO2 level.